Posts Tagged ‘feedback’
Gmusicbrowser feedback
Posted by: Collector in Xubuntu-Users on June 24th, 2012
I try this media player and like the fact that support multiple genres
& artist for a song and that you can change the GUI to look similar to
Rhythmbox for example which I´m more familiar with and as spectated is
light weight. But choose not to used it because it did not support
podcast like Rhythmbox does and I used this almost on a daily basis.
Is just convenient for me to have this feature on a media player.
gmusicbrowser users feedback request
Posted by: Collector in Xubuntu-Users on June 22nd, 2012
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 19:34 +0000,
xubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Xubuntu team is currently working on a specification to investigate if
> it would be a good move to change the media player from gmusicbrowser to
> something else.
>
> Until this date, we have received next to no negative feedback about
> gmusicbrowser, but we understand that instead of giving feedback, some
> unhappy users will just uninstall gmusicbrowser and replace with another
> media player.
>
> This is why we are contacting you, our faithful users, to gather some
> feedback about gmusicbrowser. If you have 5 to 10 minutes free time, please
> get around to answering the questions below and sending a reply back to
> this mailing list before 27th of June. Thank you!
>
> Please note that while any feedback is welcome, we are only gathering
> feedback on gmusicbrowser at this time, so please don’t send your
> recommendations on other media playes to the list.
>
> * Do you use gmusicbrowser?
> * Do you use other media players? If yes, which is your primary one,
> and why?
> * Do you like or dislike gmusicbrowser?
> * Especially if you dislike; why, what is the feature that makes you
> dislike it?
> * Generally, is there any changes you’d like to see made in gmusicbrowser?
> * Is there something else you want to say about gmusicbrowser?
>
>
> –
I use Rhythmbox, I like the Ubuntu 1 integration for MP3 downloads. Its
an Ubuntu’ feature worth using and promoting in my view. I think
Rythmbox should replace Gmusicbrowser in Xubuntu for that reason. Its
one of my post Xubuntu install actions.
Dave
(no subject)
Posted by: Collector in Xubuntu-Users on June 22nd, 2012
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:07:51 -0300
From: Bruno Benitez
To: Xubuntu Help and User Discussions
Subject: [xubuntu-users] gmusicbrowser users feedback request
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=”iso-8859-1″
Hello,
The Xubuntu team is currently working on a specification to investigate if
it would be a good move to change the media player from gmusicbrowser to
something else.
Until this date, we have received next to no negative feedback about
gmusicbrowser, but we understand that instead of giving feedback, some
unhappy users will just uninstall gmusicbrowser and replace with another
media player.
This is why we are contacting you, our faithful users, to gather some
feedback about gmusicbrowser. If you have 5 to 10 minutes free time, please
get around to answering the questions below and sending a reply back to
this mailing list before 27th of June. Thank you!
Please note that while any feedback is welcome, we are only gathering
feedback on gmusicbrowser at this time, so please don’t send your
recommendations on other media playes to the list.
* Do you use gmusicbrowser?
Yes, I use gmusicbrowser for music. I was impressed that I could play .wmv files as well as .mp3 files from my windows drive from within xubuntu. I am a xubuntu rookie, although I have used other operating systems and programming languages for over 30 years.
* Do you use other media players? If yes, which is your primary one,
and why?
I haven’t used any other audio players at this point.
* Do you like or dislike gmusicbrowser?
* Especially if you dislike; why, what is the feature that makes you
dislike it?
On occasion, when I start gmusicbrowser, it deletes the whole music library list for no apparent reason (maybe because some are on my windows drive???).
* Generally, is there any changes you’d like to see made in gmusicbrowser?
* Is there something else you want to say about gmusicbrowser?
gmusicbrowser users feedback request
Posted by: Collector in Xubuntu-Users on June 22nd, 2012
Hello,
The Xubuntu team is currently working on a specification to investigate if
it would be a good move to change the media player from gmusicbrowser to
something else.
Until this date, we have received next to no negative feedback about
gmusicbrowser, but we understand that instead of giving feedback, some
unhappy users will just uninstall gmusicbrowser and replace with another
media player.
This is why we are contacting you, our faithful users, to gather some
feedback about gmusicbrowser. If you have 5 to 10 minutes free time, please
get around to answering the questions below and sending a reply back to
this mailing list before 27th of June. Thank you!
Please note that while any feedback is welcome, we are only gathering
feedback on gmusicbrowser at this time, so please don’t send your
recommendations on other media playes to the list.
* Do you use gmusicbrowser?
* Do you use other media players? If yes, which is your primary one,
and why?
* Do you like or dislike gmusicbrowser?
* Especially if you dislike; why, what is the feature that makes you
dislike it?
* Generally, is there any changes you’d like to see made in gmusicbrowser?
* Is there something else you want to say about gmusicbrowser?
Patch Pilot Report 20120615
Posted by: Collector in Ubuntu-Devel on June 15th, 2012
Report for my patch piloting today:
https://code.launchpad.net/~veger/ubuntu/quantal/jsch/fix-for-803492-v2/+merge/104706
- Made minor tweak to OSGi manifest for new upstream release and
uploaded.
https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/precise/openldap/proposed-rebuild/+merge/104814
- Checked bug report for SRU details (now present). Changelog entry
still needs to be more verbose and versioned Build-Depends in not
present – provided further feedback to proposer.
https://code.launchpad.net/~smoser/ubuntu/precise/tgt/lp977621-start-on-install/+merge/101321
- Already uploaded elsewhere – requested rejection of MP in -devel.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/989241
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/989242
- Pushed debdiff to the folsom-proposed branch that feeds the
OpenStack CI environment and is the basis for the next archive upload.
Unsubscribed Ubuntu Sponsors.
https://code.launchpad.net/~takluyver/ubuntu/quantal/python-tz/merge-py3/+merge/105551
- Already uploaded – marked as ‘Merged’.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/598385
- Unsubscribed sponsors – nothing todo at this point in time.
https://code.launchpad.net/~logan/ubuntu/quantal/keystone/fix-for-998991-and-new-upstream/+merge/109963
- Provided feedback to proposer about how new upstream releases of
openstack components are managed by the server-dev team. Asked them
to re-submit the branch as the bug fix is OK still. Marked WIP.
https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/precise/modsecurity-apache/988819/+merge/109378
https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/precise/apache2/988819/+merge/109379
- Already uploaded to -proposed for SRU testing – not sure how to
make these disappear from the sponsoring report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss-pam-ldapd/+bug/951343
- Proposed merges for linked branches and un-subscribed sponsors
from main bug.
https://code.launchpad.net/~christopherarges/ubuntu/precise/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd/+merge/110491
https://code.launchpad.net/~christopherarges/ubuntu/oneiric/nss-pam-ldapd/nss-pam-ldapd/+merge/110492
- Both merges lacking sufficient changelog detail and incorrect
version numbers – provided feedback and set to WIP.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/redis/+bug/1009767
- Nothing for ubuntu-sponsors TODO – unsubscribed. Pending mentor
upload in Debian.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvdpau/+bug/1010920
- Merged OK – uploaded
https://code.launchpad.net/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/quantal/netcat-openbsd/merge/+merge/108072
- Already merged – marked appropriately.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libglib-perl/+bug/935525
- Removed task for precise – not appropriate; Reporter already
asked to submit to Debian; unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors as no further
action required.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1003535
- Uploaded and synced from Debian already – marked ‘Fix Released’
with comment.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ginn/+bug/769959
- Uploaded
https://code.launchpad.net/~geoubuntu/ubuntu/precise/gnomeradio/1004761/+merge/107506
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnomeradio/+bug/1004761
- Already uploaded to -proposed – added comment to bug report to
re-iterate requirement for SRU documentation.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1004018
- Un-subscribed ubuntu-sponsors – no action currently required.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/biosdevname/+bug/1006565
- Checked with cjwatson this was OK (new upstream release) tested
and uploaded.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/+bug/1011708
- Not actually a bug; responded to reporter and thanked the
contributor for preparing the patch but its not required.
https://code.launchpad.net/~kroq-gar78/ubuntu/precise/mod-proxy-html/fix-1005425/+merge/109766
- Added an extra comment about the apache2 change already in
-proposed which enables this to be fixed.
https://code.launchpad.net/~lars.duesing/ubuntu/quantal/aiccu/aiccu-1007408/+merge/110498
- Uploaded.
Comment for the day:
SRU’s which have been uploaded but not accepted are hard to
differentiate on the report – they don’t require any further sponsor
action so it would be good to be able to filter those out if possible.
Cheers
James
Does anyone knows about utmp and wtmp handling?
Posted by: Collector in Ubuntu-Devel on June 11th, 2012
Hey,
That’s a call for help,feedback,comment on lightdm bug #870297 [1]:
“Lightdm logins not being logged in wtmp”
From the comments and feedback that seems like an issue that should be
fixed in the lts, there is a merge request proposed to fix it on:
https://code.launchpad.net/~lotheac/lightdm/utmpx/+merge/107739
The lightdm project has been trying to avoid adding code “just because
it’s this way for 25 years” but trying to understand if things still
make sense on a modern linux distribution rather and that’s where we
need your help.
Does anyone knows if:
- utmp and wtmp support is still important?
- if those are “speced” or described in a reference document somewhere?
- if the login manager is the right place to record those entries?
Review of the previous listed merge request from people who know about
the topic would be welcome as well
Thanks,
Sebastien Bacher
Website & download
Posted by: Collector in Lubuntu-Users on June 4th, 2012
Hi Mark, thanks for your feedback about the difficulty of downloading.
I understand you wanted an LTS version, and you found the wiki
unhelpful for finding checksums.
It’s unclear to me if you found the instructions regarding low-RAM
unhelpful. But I hope not.
Thanks,
kanliot
>= 100 items in the queue
Posted by: Collector in Ubuntu-Users on June 4th, 2012
Hello everybody,
this is just a quick heads-up that we’re past the 100-mark on
http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/
If you all could please put a little bit of effort into reviewing these,
particularly the old ones, it’d be much appreciated.
If you are fairly new to reviewing, please check out
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews
Also, please do get in touch with me, if you would like to be added to
the piloting schedule, so you’d get a reminder to do some code reviews
once every four weeks.
Let’s all try to get the queue back down to zero, many new contributors
will appreciate our feedback.
Thanks in advance.
Have a great day,
Daniel
Code of Conduct changes
Posted by: Phill Whiteside in Ubuntu-Users on April 18th, 2012
The Ubuntu Code of Conduct is one of the founding principles of the project, you can read it in full here: http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/conduct
There is also a leadership code of conduct which is here: http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/leadership-conduct
These are being updated and merged so there will be just one, and here is the draft of it http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sabdfl/ubuntu-codeofconduct/v2-draft/view/head:/MergedCodeOfConduct.txt
There is an article about the change http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2012/04/16/code-of-conduct-update/ and if you have any feedback on it please do get in touch with the Community Council via Laura Czajkowski
